ericpruitt
It's the digital equivalent of Morty speaking with the
death crystal: https://youtu.be/YjepJlvkdKs?t=51. The
crystal shows him how he will die, so he iteratively
determines his speech based on whether he sees himself
dying with the life he wants.
|
> written-beyond
Sometimes I think I'm Morty speaking with the death
crystal but I don't even have a death crystal and all
I fear is life itself.
|
OtherShrezzing
>> write me a short story> a storyI think this is the
first time I've knowingly laughed at a model's joke.
|
lwansbrough
Try returning a short list of word options by lookup based
on the current word completion. Would save some turns.
|
ralusek
Codex and I were trying to infer why Jev gave a certain
parameter a given score. So I asked codex to produce a
list of like 30 plausible reasons Jev might've selected
that and then presented Jev with the initial prompt,
followed by "You scored this with XYZ. What was your
reasoning for doing this?" And then allowed it to do a
noul value for each of the reasons codex generated. Felt
like those people that give their dogs the buttons to
push.
|
> Bluestein
Use one black box to debug another black box. Neat :)
|
petesergeant
Jev has taught me the same lesson three times over
now.When it first came out, I thought "this weekend, I'll
do a little open-source Jev based on single-token
prediction and the token logit output", but of course when
it came to it, there were at least 5 that had already been
done between me thinking that and getting around to it.So
I wrote up[0] what other people had done, but wasn't happy
with how weak the benchmarks were, but in the time between
writing the first word and the last few, two excellent
sets of benchmarks had been written, so I was able to
incorporate those. I published the article, and one of the
authors of one of the implementations commented that I'd
beaten him to doing the write-up he'd wanted to.This
morning I thought "huh, you could have some fun giving Jev
a single letter or token at a time, turning it into a
chatbot", but as the time of looking two people had
already done this (and taken the gag further than I would
have), and ... this is isn't either of the ones I'd found.
I bet if you scratch the surface there already at leat
5.Time from idea to output has dropped off a fucking
cliff.0: https://sgnt.ai/p/jev/
|
> jorl17
I had the same sort of thing going on ahah. But I was
convinced some hoje must have already done it and I
decided I'd research when I got home (I'm out today).
Didn't expect it to reach hacker news so soon,
though!!
|
> applfanboysbgon
Time from pointless idea to bad output, anyways. We
aren't seeing good software, and now neat hobby
project ideas are getting harvested pointlessly when
the only purpose of those ideas was the fun and
learning of doing.
|
> > cyanydeez
LLMs are now like major highways, and everyone
thinks theyll solve software jams by just adding
one more lane; but that just induces demand, and
doesnt increase efficiency because the traffic jam
is about how people evaluate usage and fill the
voids.Similar to how we upgraded computers for
decades and the software bloated to fill the specs
|