macintosh.world | Log In | Register

Today | News | Books | Recipes
Notes | QuickTake | Wiki | Browse
Maps | Reference | Reddit | YouTube
Chat | Games | About

Search Books

Adventure | Science Fiction | Ghost stories | Poetry | Children | History

Book

Open Original Text

lated himself to
gain Babylon for Darius. Cf. lib. xxii., Fr. 3.

[1735] _Acerosum_, according to Nonius, is applied to coarse bread,
not sufficiently cleared from chaff and husk. Cf. lib. xv., Fr.
18. _Aceratum_, to clay mixed with stubble and straw, fit for the
brickmaker's use, the paleatum of Columella. V., vi., med. Cf. Exod.,
v., 16.

[1736] Juvenal borrows and enlarges upon this idea, in describing the
Epicurism of Montanus. Sat. iv., 139, "Nulli majus fait usus edendi
tempestati meâ. Circæ nata forent an Lucrinum ad saxum, Rutupinove
edita fundo. _Ostrea, callebat primo deprendere morsa_, et _semel
aspecti_ litus dicebat echini."

[1737] _Rutellum_, the diminutive of Rutrum. "a mattock," was the stick
with which the corn-dealer struck off the heaped-up corn, so as to make
it level with the top of his measure. It was also called Hostorium,
from the old verb Hostire, "to strike." Compare the old English
"strike," used for a measure.

[1738] _Capis_ (à capiendo, Varro, v., 121, "quod ausatæ ut prehendi
possent") was a cup with a handle, generally made of earthenware, and
ordinarily used in sacrifices. Vid. Liv., lib. x., 7. So also Capedo
and Capula. Cf. Bekker's Gallus, p. 481. The _apex_ is the conical cap
worn by the Salii.

[1739] _Præsul_ was the name applied to the Princeps Saliorum, because
he led the sacred dance, as προορχηστὴρ, ἔξαρχος. Called also Præsultor
and Præsultator. _Amtruo_ (from _am_, ἀμφὶ, circum, and _trua_, "an
implement used for stirring things round while they were being cooked")
is the technical phrase for the dancing of the Salii. The Præsul
danced at the head of the procession, _amtruabat_; the rest followed,
imitating his movements; _redamtruabant_. This procession took place in
the Comitium on the Kalends of March.

[1740] Cf. vii., Fr. 10.

BOOK X.

 ARGUMENT.

 The old Scholiast, in his Life of Persius, tells us that "after he
 had quitted school, and the instruction of his tutors, he was
 so much struck with the tenth book of the Satires of Lucilius,
 that he was seized with a vehement desire of writing Satire,
 and immediately applied himself to the imitation of this book,
 and after first detracting from his own merits, proceeded to
 disparage the poetical attempts of others." Van Heusde supposes
 that the book contained a detailed account of the life of
 Lucilius; and hence the saying of the Scholiast, that "the whole
 life of Lucilius was as distinctly known as if it had been
 portrayed in pictures." (So Horace says, Sat., II., i., 30,
 "Quo fit ut omnis Votivâ pateat veluti descripta tabella Vita
 senis.") He conjectures the difference between the subjects of
 the ninth and tenth books to have been this: that in the ninth,
 Lucilius criticised the ignorance and corrected the mistakes of
 the Librarii; i. e., those who _copied_ the compositions of the
 poets, only incidentally, and by the way, touching on the poets
 themselves. Whereas the tenth was intended directly as an attack
 upon the poets who preceded him. Jahn, in his prolegomena on
 Persius, imagines this imitation of the tenth book to have been
 carried farther than we are perhaps justified in assuming; he
 conjectures that the Hendecasyllabic Prologue of Persius was a
 direct imitation of a similar proem, and in the same metre which
 formed the commencement of this book. This opinion he fortifies
 by two quotations, one from Petronius, Sat. iv., the other from
 Apuleius, de Deo Socr., p. 364. In this view Gerlach does not
 coincide, though he is disposed to admit that Lucilius in all
 probability began the book with a disparagement of himself,
 and so far furnished an example for Persius to imitate. It
 is a question that must remain doubtful, and is of no great
 importance. It is, however, also clear that this book contained
 criticisms on the verses of Accius and Ennius. (Vid. Schol. ad
 Hor., i., Sat. x.)

 Perhaps the Fragments (incert. 3, 4, and 5) on Albutius and Mucius
 may have belonged to this book.

 1 ... as we wrote before, the judgment to be formed is concerning
 the honors of the Crassi ... that is, in each case let us lay
 down what I should choose, what not.[1741]

 2 Behind stood the nimble skirmisher in his cloak.[1742]

 3 ... although suddenly to bring down from three pair of
 stairs.[1743]

 4 ... you also bind mooring-stakes to very strong cables.[1744]

 5 ... might be firmly ... from waves and adverse winds.

 6 ... and languor overwhelmed, and sluggishness, and the torpor
 of quietude.

 7 ... verily, he said I cut up the ox magnificently in the
 temple.[1745]

 8 ... would seem importunate, boastful, bad and nefarious.

FOOTNOTES:

[1741] Gerlach's reading and interpretation is followed: "Lucilius
would not wish to have all the honors of that illustrious family heaped
upon him, but make his own selection." Nonius also explains _sumere_ by
"eligere." Corpet reads, "Crassi" and "sicut describimus," and supposes
the allusion to be to the eloquence of Crassus, son-in-law of Scævola.
Cf. Cic., Brut., 38-44. But no doubt P. Licinius Crassus Dives Mucianus
is here meant, who, as we learn from Aulus Gellius (I., xiii., 10),
was famous for five things: he was the richest man in Rome, the man of
noblest birth, the most eloquent, the best lawyer, and the Pontifex
Maximus. Lucilius might well be at a loss which of all these he would
choose.

[1742] Cf. lib. vii., Fr. 7. Schol. ad Juv., vi., 400.

[1743] _Quamvis_ may also imply "quamvis fæminam." Cf. Cæcilium in
Asoto (ap. Nonium, p. 517), "nam ego duabus vigiliis transactis _Duco
desubito_ domum." _Trinis scalis_, "from the third story," the upper
rooms being the residence of the poorer classes. Cf. Juv., x., 18,
"rarus venit in cœnacula miles." iii., 201, "altimus ardebit quem
tegula sola tuetur à pluviâ." vii., 118. Mart., i., Ep. cxviii., 7, "Et
scalis habito tribus sed altis." Hor., i., Ep. i., 91. Suet., Vit., 7.

[1744] _Tonsilla_, according to Festus, "is a stake with an iron head,
for sticking in the ground and fastening the mooring cable of a boat
to." Cf. Pacuvium in Medo, "accessi eam et tonsillam pegi læto in
littore." (Fr. 17, ed. Fr. H. Bothe, Lips., 1834.) The MS. reading is
_Consellæ_, "double seats," stretched on ropes, as the beds (grabati).
Lucil., vi., Fr. 13; xi., 13. Nonius explains _aptare_ by "connectere"
and "colligare."

[1745] Cf. Donat. in Terent., Andr., II., i., 24.

BOOK XI.

 ARGUMENT.

 Schoenbeck supposes this book to have been written in memory of the
 Iberian war; because it not only touches on military affairs, but
 contains also some bitter sarcasms on the morals of certain young
 men who served in that campaign. Petermann coincides in the same
 opinion. Corpet supposes that the principal object of the book
 was an elaborate defense of the character of Scipio Africanus;
 especially with regard to the salutary and strict discipline
 which he restored to the Roman army during the Numantine war.
 Gerlach admits the probabil

Previous Next